Imagine you have multiple pieces of data or facts before you. How do you make sense of it? Well you could try and draw up a theory or explanation that best explains the facts at hand. Enter Inductive Arguments. For example the resurrection of Jesus Christ has many historical facts attached to it (like the empty tomb, the martyrdom of the disciples etc.) Did the disciples steal the body? Did they hallucinate? Maybe Jesus didn’t really die in the first place? Maybe He had an unknown twin? How do you pick one theory as the better fit? Join us to know more!
01:25 Areopagus 2022?
02:20 The mistake we make while learning deductive arguments
08:03 What are Inductive Arguments?
09:49 How does it work?
11:11 Can Ankit induce dog-bite probability?
12:52 Can we infer if smoking is unhealthy?
14:43 Can we find some other explanation?
16:03 The drawback of Inductive Arguments
17:56 Is one theory better? Ask these questions
19:42 How much of the data is accounted for?
20:55 Does the theory make the data more probable?
21:56 How many assumptions are introduced?
Links and citation:
Interested to join our voluntary team as Graphic Designer? Reach out to us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Watch the video podcast here (https://youtu.be/cG2icwDmW10)
Equipping the believer defend their faith anytime, anywhere. Our vision is to do so beyond all language barriers in India and beyond!
SAFT Apologetics stands for Seeking Answers Finding Truth and was formed off inspiration from the late Nabeel Qureshi’s autobiography that captured his life journey where he followed truth where it led him. We too aim to be a beacon emulating his life’s commitment towards following truth wherever it leads us.
Is there a question that you would like to share with us?
Send us your questions, suggestions and queries at: email@example.com